Oh Ellie, i genuinely feel sorry for you. You going through some hard times at Uni? Did you wet the bed last night? You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about when it comes to Music. Just because you reference Muse albums of old that were probably out before you were even a teenager (please move on), and you study Music doesn’t mean you do know what you’re talking about. The musicality and arrangement of this album is genius, it’s a fun album and will be astounding live on tour. The only thing that was accurate about your ‘review’ was that it was 80’s inspired, well done for working that out. I can tell by your negativity towards the new album, which stands out from all the dross of the music industry today, you’re never likely to be the life and sole at parties…. 2/10 is simply laughable and I can only wish you the best in your search for new music that makes you happy (I hear Olly Murs has a new album, give that one a go) Reply
I lost interest in your opinion the moment you compared Matt Bellamy to Thom Yorke. That meme died out about 15 years ago and had next to no substance to begin with. It’s usually only used by Radiohead fans who hate Muse for being Muse. I love both bands and they are far from similar, especially in 2018. Probably the worst review of the album (alongside Pitchfork’s review) I’ve seen and not because of the score, but more the lack of serious analysis of the tracks and the critiques being lazy comparisons with no substance. Personally thought this was Muse’s best entry since The Resistance, maybe even Black Holes and Revelations. Yes there are some poor tracks in the mid section, but the majority of the album is good and some tracks such as Algorithm, The Dark Side, Blockades and The Void are fantastic. Would give it a 6.5/10. You say your a fan of things that are pretentious, which is exactly how I would describe your review, so congratulations! Reply
Are you angry Man? May be you are unhappy? Honnestly, you didn’t listen To the album, it’s not possible. Yeah, true, get UP and fight IS crappy. And what? The void and algorithm are brillant. Thé Dark side IS the perfect mix of rock and electro. Yes true, Propaganda chorus IS weird but it’s grows in you and then this song rocks. So does break it To me. Blockades IS very good. Thought Contagion IS classic Muse and very good. Dig down and pressure are not Bad, and so better than everything at the radio. Something human coule bé so much better. It’s not a Big deal. I am an old Muse fan and i love all their album. This one desserves To be considerated as a visionnary album. Of course, you are not ready for that. Poor you. Reply
I wouldn’t show your lecturers this lousy and truly disgusting attempt at an “album review” – it isn’t your finest of work. Infact, anyone who has listened to Simulation Theory and then reads what you’ve wrote here will know you’re just talking bullshit. Maybe you should consider dropping the music degree, it’s genuinely that laughable. I made a bloody account for this review, that’s how annoyed I am at you for making up this crap. I give your review a whopping 0/10. Reply
Can you at least give actual criticism to Blockades and The Void? Like it’s fine if you don’t like these songs but “I’m sad” and “This wasn’t worth it” don’t mean shit. Do your job and write a well thought out reason for these statements, and maybe then I’ll consider this a serious review. Reply
Hey Ellie, how’ya doing? I’m one of those mindboggling fans who still get excited over new Muse releases. Been a fan since 2006. Truth to be told, The Resistance, The 2nd Law and Drones were a bit hit-and-miss and not comparable to the band’s heyday, but this album really gave me the same vibe as listening to Black Holes & Revelations as a new fan did back in the day. Algorithm builds up in this ridiculously epic way that reminds me of Take A Bow (from that album) and also classics like the Flash Gordon theme song by Queen. That sort of thing just makes my day, you know? It’s why I became a fan of the band in the first place. Propaganda and Break It To Me are interesting departures for the band, although Propaganda sounds like the next logical evolution from Supermassive Black Hole. Matt wrote that song making fun of his speech impediment (that makes him proncounce”Proper” like “Pwopa”). It honestly sounds like they had loads of fun recording this album, during my first listen of Propaganda I giddily burst out in laughter. I’m sorry that you didn’t like that track or Break It To Me and you thumb your nose at them, as I’ve had these tracks on repeat for the last couple of days. The Void sounds like their darker material from earlier albums, like Ruled By Secrecy or Hoodoo, filtered through that John Carpenter / Vangelis lense, and I can’t get enough of it. You lament everyone besides the band who has been involved in promoting this album, but the music videos look like a lot of fun went into making that stuff. You seem to describe the process as some sort of coalmine labor, sweatshop exploitation or prostitution, but If Terry Crews likes current Muse enough to voluntarily star in two videos then it can’t be that bad now can it? I’m not a different species from you, although Juggalos are also the same species as us both. If being a Muse fan is more like being a Juggalo than like being a cool music-reviewing kid like you then I guess I’ll have to live with it, because this album sounds fun to my ears, moreso than what any woozy floozy like yourself can conjure up on this zillionth website dedicated to dancing about architecture, I mean writing about music. But if this is what gives you pleasure and purpose in your life, then all power to you. I dabble a bit in writing and music myself and bands like Muse inspire me to do whatever the fuck I want to when it comes to my art, because the arbitrary barriers of good taste make everything so incredibly dull. Reply
> I would hope that this album is actually part of a simulated reality which was built for me to practice being snarky in writing form Whatever the purpose of music is, it’s never been serving as a creative writing exercise for music critics. That’s more of an unfortunate side-effect. When we were all hunter gatherers singing and dancing communally, who would’ve thought that snarky putdowns of someone else’s music would one day become a (lowly) paid job? Music has given me a lot of joy, music critics a lot of eye-rolls. Especially in the age of Spotify where you don’t have to purchase an album before listening to it, it’s become even more useless than the porn magazine section of a corner shop. I can name a couple of things music criticism is good for: the amusement of the critic itself, and free publcity for the band in question, even if negative. When people still took critics seriously instead of forming their own opinions, negative publicity unfortunately had the potential to ruin a band’s career and reputation, but those days luckily seem long gone. The only ones who still give a toss are people on message boards who have managed to turn their music taste into the sole source of their self-worth and identity. Ellie I’m sure you’re lovely in person, but I give your profession (if it is indeed your profession, and not an unpaid hobby, because music criticism is one of those fields where the difference between professionals and amateurs is quite hard to detect) a strong 4 to a light 4.5/10. (PS: Please don’t take my post too seriously, it’s all meant in good fun, and your review happened to be good practise for snarky writing). Reply
Yikes, Ellie. You seem to feel the need to compare every song/style change to another band and, because of that, you have trouble making sense of the songs. Not everything has to remind you of another thing you know? Your review would be 20 words long if you didnt keep going and making yourself talk about the comparisons you made up that dont even work. That are a lot of things to critique in this album, unoriginality is not one of them, I think. Reply
muse should probably change their name, they are not muse anymore, this is another band. There are several reasons why I and a hell a lot of people love muse. On simulation theory, there is nothing to love. I would also give a 2/10 on this album, only for them putting an alternative version of the album, including versions of the songs without so many freaking synths , there are a couple of them which are quite nice, but still nothing exciting. . I first got into muse before they even released their first album, met them on London underground scenes, seen them grow with me , play bigger shows, theaters, then arenas, seen them being the first band to by selling out the new wembley stadium and that show was one on their very peak…All this was so freaking good, till the resistance era. A second law was cool too, sounded like a good change. But then muse started loosing themselves, where they unsuccessfully tried to put themselves back from 2nd law mix electro guitar-experiment by putting out a mediocracy album drones, on which they did not reach their own level of the past, stared sounding boring, repetitive. Muse were never repetitive, on every album you had a surprisingly new approach, such as something that grows up and matures, but the roots are there, they still sounded like muse… Well now simulation theory is so deliberately intentional, they just wanted to sound like something else so badly, and yes they managed to do it successfully ! Yet they lost their own sound, together with the all the very emotion behind it. And this is how something dies. Reply